If we only look at software and forget the data acquisition method, I cannot believe many would choose Baron's product over GRLevel3.įor what it's worth, I've had full data during my last 3 chases (in southern KS, in sw OK and nw TX, and in nw OK). If you can afford it, I suppose WxWorx would be the easiest option. Again, people and different budgets, and I'm a grad student who's getting married and honeymooning this summer, so my budget isn't particularly healthy. I don't find WxWorx to offer enough benefit (well, the only benefit I see is the always-on) to justify the cost. The entire advantage of WxWorx is that it is "always on". Folks are also working on satellite product overlays now as well.Īll that said. For example, I have a placefile to display all Skywarn ham radio repeaters in Oklahoma. GR3 lets you add data sources (dynamic or static) as you want, through the use of Dynamic Placefiles. As for other sources, you can add a bunch of other data - for example, Tyler and I both have scripts to display METARs / Surface observations, SPC products (Day 1/2 convective outlooks, probability products, watch outlines, etc), and so forth. In addition, GR3 has street-level mapping, GPS support and weather warnings (polygon graphics and full text, including severe weather statements). not heavily degraded) Level III radar data, including the 4 reflectivity tilts, 4 radial velocity tilts, 4 storm-relative vel tilts, VIL, Echo Tops, Composite Reflectivity, and so forth. If we only look at the software itself, there is no question that GR3 is the better piece of software. The entire advantage of WxWorx is that it is ALWAYS on - you don't have to worry about having a cell connection, etc.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |